Best Thing I Ate: Too Good to Be Stew
Treat Your Feelings: We Have the Perfect Baked-Good Solution for Any Problem
Back to Hydra: Revisiting the Scene of One of Vanmag’s Most Controversial Reviews
Wine List: The Best Italian Wines to Try at Vancouver International Wine Fest
Find an Excuse to Celebrate, Because These Sparkling Wines Are the Best in the Fizz
Editors’ Picks: The Best Things We Drank in 2023
City Informer: Why Is a Hummingbird the Official City Bird of Vancouver?
5 Things to Do in Vancouver This Week (February 26- March 3)
Your forever home. Your forever fund.
Escape to Osoyoos: Your Winter Wonderland Awaits
Your 2023/2024 Ultimate Local Winter Getaway Guide
Kamloops Unscripted: The Most Intriguing Fall Destination of 2023
Protected: Experience Kitchen Brilliance: Unveiling the Ultimate Culinary Workstation
Vancouver-Based Fashion Brand Ization Studio Brings the Fun
7 Stylish, Statement-Making Jackets for Spring
Does earthquake insurance make sense for homeowners? It almost certainly did when it used to cost cents-on average, six or seven per $100 cost of rebuilding-but that was when insurers bet that a truly damaging earthquake would roll around only once every 1,500 years. Coming off Canada’s biggest natural-disaster payout year in history (floods, ice storms), rates have nearly doubled. Rates vary by location, with delta dwellers in places like Richmond paying the most and condo owners getting a bit of a break.
Our newly expanded rates are still about half those in California, where earthquakes are more common, yet almost half of British Columbians have been declining the coverage, which is rarely included in a basic property insurance bill and required by only a few mortgagors. These homeowners are taking the opposite bet, rolling the dice that the big one won’t strike quite yet
Including earthquake insurance on a $500,000 dwelling (there’s no need to insure that $2 million lot) will add $500 a year to your property insurance bill-with a deductible possibly into six figures. Five years ago, that coverage would have cost only $300 a year